Skip to content

Online vs. Face-to-Face Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy for Depression -a Randomized Controlled Trial

In male and female adults suffering from depression, is online cognitive behavioural therapy more effective than face-to-face treatment in terms of clinical outcomes and working alliance?

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12611000563965
Enrollment
60
Registered
2011-06-02
Start date
2009-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

This study explores depression and the working alliance between client and therapist at the end of a cognitive-behavioral intervention for depression. The participants were randomized to an internet-based treatment group or face-to-face group. Both groups received the same cognitive behavioral therapy over an eight-week timeframe, at the end of which participants completed the Beck Depression Inventory and the Working Alliance Inventory.

Interventions

cognitive behavioural therapy, duration 8 weeks, online setting vs. face-to-face, participants complete two modules per week for 8 weeks. Each module should take about 45 minutes to complete.

Sponsors

University of Zurich
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Score greater than or equal to 12 on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)

Exclusion criteria

current substance abuse or dependence psychotic symptoms high risk of suicide currently receiving treatment illiterate in German

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Mar 27, 2026