Skip to content

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of sublingual immunotherapy in natural rubber latex allergic patients

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of sublingual immunotherapy in natural rubber latex (NRL) allergic patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12611000543987
Enrollment
28
Registered
2011-05-30
Start date
2004-02-02
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

BACKGROUND: Natural rubber latex allergy is still an unsolved health problem. In addition to the recommended avoidance to the allergen, therapeutic measures are needed and therefore so are immunotherapy extracts with proven efficacy and safety. The aim of the present randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of latex sublingual immunotherapy in adult patients undergoing permanent latex avoidance. METHODS: Twenty-eight adult latex-allergic patients (5 males and 23 females), with mean age of 39 years (range 24-57) were randomized to receive a commercial latex-sublingual immunotherapy or placebo during one year, followed by another year of open, active therapy. The following outcomes were measured at baseline and at the end of first and second year of follow-up: skin prick test, gloves-use score, conjunctival challenge test, total and specific IgE, basophil activation test, and adverse reactions monitoring. RESULTS: No significant difference in any of the efficacy in vivo variables was observed between active and placebo groups at the end of the placebo-controlled phase, nor when each group was compared with their baseline values at the end of the two year-study. An improvement in the average percentage of basophils activated was observed. During the induction phase, 4 reactions in the active and 5 in the placebo group were recorded. During the maintenance phase, two patients dropped out due to pruritus and to acute dermatitis respectively. CONCLUSION: Further studies are needed to evaluate latex-sublingual immunotherapy, since efficacy could not be demonstrated in adult patients with avoidance of the allergen.

Interventions

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) to latex (SLIT latex, ALK-Abello, Madrid, Spain). The SLIT is oral fluid. The treatment was administered once a day: two drops of SLIT each day. The study was performed in two phases: the first one, double-blind, placebo-controlled during one year; and the second one, also for one year, opened, where every patient received active treatment.

Sponsors

Allergy Service. Hospital Santiago Apostol
Lead SponsorHospital

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
24 Years to 57 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria comprised a clinical history of natural rubber latex allergy (documenting the usual symptoms of urticaria, angioedema, rhinitis, conjunctivitis, asthma or anaphylaxis) or a positive response to the gloves use test and/or conjunctival test plus positive prick test to NRL (wheal greater than or equal to 3x3 mm).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria consisted of the usual contraindications for the use of immunotherapy and the presence of severe systemic or psychiatric diseases, chronic urticaria or dermographism.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Mar 28, 2026