None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to determine which of two different approaches in accessing an artery, transfemoral (via the artery in the groin) or transradial (via the artery in the wrist), both of these are currently used in clinical practice, is least associated with bleeding and procedural related complications. It will also determine whether using an ultrasound machine to guide the arterial access will reduce bleeding and other procedural related complications.
Interventions
Randomisation 1: Transradial approach to arterial access. Both the femoral and the radial artery are routinely used as entry sites for coronary angiography and angioplasty. Although femoral artery access is more common, radial artery access is associated with reduced bleeding complications. The procedure may take 30minutes to 1 hour. Randomisation 2: Ultrasound-guided access The operator will use an ultrasound probe to guide the needle into the femoral/radial artery. The procedure may take 30minutes to 1 hour.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
All patients over 18 years of age who present to the cardiac catheter lab
Exclusion criteria
1. Cardiogenic shock or intubated patients 2. Previous CABG 3. Negative Allen’s test 4. Known difficulties (including previous unsuccessful access) with femoral (i.e. Leriche syndrome, severe peripheral artery disease, large abdominal aortic aneurysm) or radial access (Raynaud syndrome). 5. Simultaneous right heart catherisation 6. Pregnant 7. Haemodialysis patients with an arteriovenous fistula 8. Inability to give informed consent or unable to apply with all requirements