None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
Screw stabilisation of the disrupted ankle syndesmosis maintains reduction as healing of the distal tibiofibular ligaments occurs. It has previously been thought that syndesmosis screws may contribute to ankle dysfunction by restricting the normal motion between the tibia and fibula. Screw removal, breakage, or loosening may restore motion but can permit loss of reduction if these occur before complete ligamentous healing. As a result, although some well-established principles exist for reduction and surgical treatment of syndesmotic injuries, there remains controversy regarding whether routine syndesmosis screw removal is desirable. We plan to conduct a prospective, randomized, controlled trial to investigate the outcomes of patients with ankle syndesmosis screws left in situ and compare these with the outcomes of patients with removed syndesmosis screws. To date, there have been no randomised, controlled trials comparing these two patient groups.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Male or female patients; greater than or equal to 16 years of age; ankle fracture with diastasis for planned syndesmosis screw fixation; AP, lateral and mortise X-ray views of the ankle taken preoperatively; closed fractures; consent form signed.
Exclusion criteria
Ankle fractures not requiring syndesmosis screw fixation; compound fractures; pathologic fractures; fracture in a polytraumatised patient; fracture of a bone in the same lower limb (other than ankle fracture complex); patients > 65 years of age; past history of fracture or significant injury or disability of the same ankle; medical conditions too serious for surgery; patients who are unfit to consent; pregnant women.