Skip to content

A Randomized controlled trial comparing Topical use of Mupirocin versus Medihoney for the prevention of infection at Tenckhoff Exit Site in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

A Randomized controlled trial comparing Topical use of Mupirocin versus Medihoney for the prevention of infection at Tenckhoff Exit Site in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Status
Suspended
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12611000297921
Acronym
TUMMIE Trial
Enrollment
380
Registered
2011-03-21
Start date
2011-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

not recruiting

Interventions

Once daly application of Topical Medihoney (gauze pad) approximately10 mg ( size of a pea) at Peritoneal dialysis catheter exit site once daily (the medihoney dressing will be changed daily ) compared topical application of small amount Mupirocin using cotton bud to Peritoneal dialysis catheter exit site once daily ( 12 months )

Sponsors

Department of Renal Medicine
Lead SponsorHospital

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients on peritoneal dialysis.( Incident and prevalent) 2. Able to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. PD patients who had exit site infection, peritonitis, or tunnel infection within the last 4 weeks 2. Known hypersensitivity to, or intolerance of, honey or mupirocin. 3. On long term antibiotics for any reason. 4. Patients with a history of psychological illness or condition which interferes with their ability to understand or comply with the requirements of the study.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026