Skip to content

Comparison of Static Stretching techniques and Hold- Relax on flexibility, mobility, balance and cadence healthy elderly.

To evaluate the effect of a stretching program for four weeks, with the techniques of Static Stretching and Hold- Relax on the range of motion, mobility, balance and cadence of healthy elderly.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12610000903088
Enrollment
40
Registered
2010-10-25
Start date
2010-04-26
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

To evaluate the effect of static stretching techniques (SS) and hold-relax (HR) on the range of motion (ROM), balance, mobility, and cadence of healthy elderly. Methods: We selected 29 women aged 68 +/- 11 years. The participants were divided randomly into three groups: control group (CG) (n = 8), group SS (SSG) (n = 10) and group HR (HRG) (n = 11). CG performed the tests and attended lectures. The SSG conducted a session of 60 seconds of SS passive and HRG, a 60-second session of stretching HR. Stretching exercises were performed in the hamstring muscles of both legs, after 10 min of warm-up, twice a week for four consecutive weeks. Evaluations were performed before and after intervention of ROM through photogrammetry, balance, through the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), the mobility using the Timed up and go and cadence by count the steps per minute. Results: An increase in ROM for SSG and increase in HRG and scores of BBS Timed up and go and cadence only to the HRG. Conclusion: The techniques of stretching SS and HR promoted increased ROM of the hamstrings and HR technique was more effective than SS in improving balance, mobility, and cadence of elderly.

Interventions

Twenty-nine healthy sedentary elderly completed the study protocol: Control Group (GC) (64 + / - 5 years, n = 8) performed the tests and participated in lectures and cultural and recreational activities, (n 66 + / - 8 years, n = 10), Static Stretching Group (SSG) and Hold- Relax Group (HRG) (69 + / - 5 years, n = 11) were tested and stretching exercises and performed by a physical educator. The elderly woman was positioned lying supine with the spine aligned horizontally and one set of legs lyi

Twenty-nine healthy sedentary elderly completed the study protocol: Control Group (GC) (64 + / - 5 years, n = 8) performed the tests and participated in lectures and cultural and recreational activities, (n 66 + / - 8 years, n = 10), Static Stretching Group (SSG) and Hold- Relax Group (HRG) (69 + / - 5 years, n = 11) were tested and stretching exercises and performed by a physical educator. The elderly woman was positioned lying supine with the spine aligned horizontally and one set of legs lying on the extension of the body, with 0o of hip flexion by a band of tissue, 2) to the Static Stretching (SS) the other leg held a flexion hip and knee extension, the ceiling for each participant until a restriction point but not in pain, then, the physical educator passively maintain the position from the point mentioned, during 60 seconds. In the Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) technique was used to hold-relax (HR). This technique is similar to the Contract-Relax technique (CR), except that the antagonistic muscle pattern resists enough to cause an isotonic contraction and not, as in Contract- Relax (CR). In HRG, the participant was supine and the therapist positioned the leg to be stretched in flexion, adduction and external rotation of the hip, extended knee, dorsiflexion with inversion of the foot to reach the restriction point. Once reached the restriction point, the senior was asked to perform an isometric contraction matching in the sense of extension, abduction and internal rotation of the thigh, knee extended, plantar flexion with eversion for 10 s. Immediately after, we asked the research subjects, the relaxation of the limb, followed by 20 s of passive stretching in the direction of flexion, adduction and external rotation of thigh, knee extended, dorsiflexion with foot inversion. And from this new range of motion possible, repeat the procedure a total of 60 S. The interventions were performed for 60 seconds in both lower limbs, once a day, twice a week for four consecutive weeks. Both HRG and SSG performed ten minutes of warm-up before stretching exercises.The following tests were performed before and after the program of stretching exercises: photogrammetry to assess range of motion of the hamstring muscles, Berg Balance Scale (BBS) to assess balance, Timed up and go for mobility and step counts per minute to assess the cadence.

Sponsors

Universidade Federal do Parana- UFPR
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
57 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Included were women aged 57 to 80 years and in stable health conditions, with the physical ability to perform the exercises and had not performed regular exercise in the last eight weeks.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria were: secondary joint damage, heart disease, cancer, neurological disorders, prosthetic use, systolic blood pressure above 200mmHg and diastolic blood pressure above 110 mmHg, regular exercise participation over the last eight weeks, anti-indication for exercise, severe functional limitations or cognitive dysfunction.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026