Skip to content

A comparison of conventional high-flux versus a novel Helixone dialysis membrane on oxidative stress in stable haemodialysis patients.

The impact of standard high flux polysulfone versus novel high flux polysulfone (Helixone) dialysis membranes on inflammatory markers in stable haemodialysis patients: A randomised single blinded controlled clinical trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12610000427077
Acronym
Oxidative stress and dialysis membranes
Enrollment
60
Registered
2010-05-26
Start date
2004-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The hypothesis to be tested by this study is that the improved clearance of middle molecules (thought to be important uremic toxins) by the new FX 80 membrane would lead to less oxidative stress and inflammation when compared to dialysis using a standard hig-flux membrane.

Interventions

Comparison of conventional high-flux dialysis (HF80 polysulfone membrane) with helixone high-flux dialysis (FX series polysulfone membrane). The FX series membrane has a higher molecular flux enabling greater clearance of middle molecules compared to the standard high flux membranes. All participants will maintain their standard dialysis regime (duration of dialysis per session, sessions per week and blood flow speed). The only difference between groups is the dialysis membrane used for the 12 m

Comparison of conventional high-flux dialysis (HF80 polysulfone membrane) with helixone high-flux dialysis (FX series polysulfone membrane). The FX series membrane has a higher molecular flux enabling greater clearance of middle molecules compared to the standard high flux membranes. All participants will maintain their standard dialysis regime (duration of dialysis per session, sessions per week and blood flow speed). The only difference between groups is the dialysis membrane used for the 12 month period

Sponsors

Fresenius Medical Care Southeast Asia
Lead SponsorCommercial sector/Industry

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

stable haemodialysis patients aged from 18 to 75 years; using established arterio-venous fistulae or fistulae constructed from synthetic grafts; and who had been established on haemodialysis for at least 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

an inability to give informed consent; unlikely to remain on dialysis for at least 9 months (either due to impending demise or transplantation); prior demonstrated allergy to polysulfone membranes; dialysis via a central venous access catheter; any evidence of an ongoing inflammatory response including infection, auto-immune disorders, vasculitis, treatment with any immunosuppressive agents or the presence of any malignancy.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026