Skip to content

Force Versus Electromyographic (EMG) Signals for Biofeedback in Isometric Training

Analysis of the Relationship Between Force and Electromyographic Signals used as Biofeedback for Isometric Muscle Strength Training in Healthy Volunteers

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12610000233022
Enrollment
48
Registered
2010-03-19
Start date
2009-06-06
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

To compare the gain of strength and electrical activation of the quadriceps femoris muscle of subjects undergoing biofeedback training using force and EMG signals.

Interventions

The volunteers will perform three maximal voluntary isometric contractions of six seconds each with a period of 120 seconds of rest between each contraction and both force and eletromyographic siganls will be recorded during this assessment without visual and verbal feedback. After 10 minutes, training will be performed with series of maximal voluntary isometric contractions of six seconds duration each with a period of 120 seconds of rest between each contraction and 180 seconds of rest betwee

The volunteers will perform three maximal voluntary isometric contractions of six seconds each with a period of 120 seconds of rest between each contraction and both force and eletromyographic siganls will be recorded during this assessment without visual and verbal feedback. After 10 minutes, training will be performed with series of maximal voluntary isometric contractions of six seconds duration each with a period of 120 seconds of rest between each contraction and 180 seconds of rest between each serie with visual feedback. In each of them volunteers were encouraged to surpass 10 % (updated for each new series) of the reference value. If the volunteer was not able to reach this value in the next series, an adjustment was made lowering 5 % and, if they failed again, training was halt at this point. After training force and eletromyographic signals will be compared.

Sponsors

Francisco Locks Neto
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Educational / counselling / training
Masking
Blinded (masking used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Age 18-25, gender: female, healthy individuals, non sedentary lifestyle

Exclusion criteria

history of lower limb injury, previous history of knee surgery, neurological and / or visual and auditory deficits

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026