Skip to content

Comparing a six minute walk test with a standard 24 hour holter monitor for the assessment of ventricular rate control in permanent atrial fibrillation.

Comparing a six minute walk test with a standard 24 hour holter monitor for the assessment of ventricular rate control in permanent atrial fibrillation-a noninferiority trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12610000231044
Enrollment
40
Registered
2010-03-19
Start date
2010-03-25
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

the primary purpose is to show that the use of a simple inexpensive test such as a 6 minute walk with measuring of heart rate is as good as the more inconvienient, time consuming and expensive but gold standard test of 24 holter monitor in assessing moderate exercise ventricular heart rate control in atrial fibrillation.

Interventions

subjects will perform a 6 minute walk with a cardiac monitor on and maximal heart rate and time above certain threshholds measured. The subject will then have a 24 hour Holter monitor attached and similar measures to above made. These will then be compared to ensure non inferiority of6 minute walk. Each will be a one off assessment. over duration of enrollment will be 3 months

Sponsors

John Wilson
Lead SponsorIndividual

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
0 to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Permanent Atrial fibrillation Able to mobilise

Exclusion criteria

Not in atrial fibrillation self reported pregnancy pacemaker

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026