Skip to content

The effectiveness and safety of two dermal fillers (Juvederm Ultra Plus versus Restylane Perlane) in the treatment of patients with severe nasolabial folds.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Juvederm Ultra Plus vs. Restylane Perlane in the Treatment of Subjects with Severe Nasolabial Folds. Phase I and Phase II (Long Term Extension Phase)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12609000969268
Enrollment
75
Registered
2009-11-09
Start date
2007-03-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The primary purpose of this study is to determine whether the differences in the product characteristics of 2 commercially available hyaluronic acid (HA)-based dermal fillers translate to differences in their long term durability in patients with severe age-related nasolabial folds (NLFs), following a single administration.

Interventions

Juvederm Ultra Plus (hyaluronic acid-based dermal filler) administered by injection directly into the nasolabial fold (NLF) as a single treatment. Up to 2 syringes can be administered to correct the volume deficit in the allocated NLF, with each syringe containing a volume of 0.8 ml. The concentration of hyaluronic acid in each syringe is 24 mg/ml.

Sponsors

Allergan Australia
Lead SponsorCommercial sector/Industry

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
30 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. severe nasolabial folds 2. No other anti-wrinkle treatment in NLF/mouth region for study duration 3. No history of non-ablative resurfacing procedures, dermabrasion, face-lift, photorejuvenation tehniques, or other surgical procedures in lower 2/3 of face & neck

Exclusion criteria

1. Permanent or semi-permanent implants in lower 2/3 of face 2. Facial hair, lesions, inflammation, infection or visual scars in treatment area 3. History of connective tissue disease 4. Pregnant or breast-feeding

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026