Cruciate Retaining vs Posterior Stabilised Total Knee Replacement: A Randomised Clinical Trial

A randomised trial to compare a cruciate retaining prosthesis with a posterior stabilised prosthesis for functional outcomes in total knee arthroplasty

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

ANZCTR

Registry ID

ACTRN12609000960257

Enrollment

Registered

2009-11-06

Start date

2009-11-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare two differnt types of prosthesis used in total knee replacement to see which gives the best functional outcome.

Interventions

Patient will undergo total knee arthroplasty. The prosthesis used will be a posterior stabilised device. The operation will take 2 hours.

Study design

Allocation

Randomised controlled trial

Intervention model

Parallel

Primary purpose

Treatment

Masking

Blinded (masking used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

40 Years to 90 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Primary total knee replacement

Exclusion criteria

Patients will be excluded from the trial for tibial deformity (including past fracture or high tibial osteotomy) or valgus deformity.

Outcome results