None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
Several randomized controlled trials have been conducted in preterm infants to determine whether inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) reduces the rates of death and/or chronic lung disease. The results of these studies appear contradictory. Some studies have shown a reduction in lung injury, one has shown a reduction in cerebral injury, and several others have shown no effect. The different patient characteristics and different trial characteristics within these trials may explain this difference. The purpose of this systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis is to determine whether inhaled nitric oxide in preterm infants receiving assisted ventilation improves survival without morbidity, specifically without chronic lung disease (CLD), cerebral injury, retinal injury, and improves survival without long-term disability. Secondly to determine whether the effects of inhaled nitric oxide differ according to the risk profile of the patient in terms of gestational age at birth, severity of illness, antenatal steroid use, postnatal age at the time of randomization, ventilation mode at randomization, administration of exogenous surfactant, inhaled nitric dosage and duration of nitric oxide administration.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
For the purposes of this meta-analysis it was decided to include any trials that were: Studies will be included if they are randomised controlled trials preterm infants (<37 weeks) receiving assisted ventilation
Exclusion criteria
For the purposes of this meta-analysis it was decided to exclude any trials that were: Non randomised controlled trials using term infants