None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
We aim to conduct a randomised controlled trial to determine the efficacy of two oral regimens of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole compared to benzathine penicillin (BPG), for the treatment of skin sores (also known as impetigo) in Aboriginal children living in remote communities. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole may be a much more acceptable oral alternative compared to the uncomfortable and poorly received intramuscular benzathine penicillin which is the current standard of care.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Age 12 weeks to less than 13 years at the time written consent is obtained 2. Diagnosis of purulent or crusted impetigo by criteria outlined in the Booklet “Recognising and Treating Skin Conditions” (East Arnhem Healthy Skin Program (EAHSP), Menzies School of Health Research 2006). 3. A resident in one of the participating communities at the time of enrolment and intending to stay in that community for the duration of the study (7 days post randomisation).
Exclusion criteria
1. Receipt of any antibiotic in the previous seven days, or receipt of benzathine penicillin G (BPG) in the previous 30 days. 2. The presence of impetigo lesions that are only “flat-dry” (i.e. lesions that are not purulent or crusted) by criteria outlined in the Booklet “Recognising and Treating Skin Conditions” (EAHSP, Menzies School of Health Research 2006). 3. Known allergy to penicillin, sulphonamides or trimethoprim, or other constituents of study medications. 4. Immunocompromised, that is acquired, congenital or iatrogenic. 5. Previous participation in the trial in the last 90 days. 6. Evidence of sepsis, cellulitis, bullous impetigo, boils or carbuncles. 7. Intention by the patient or parent to use topical antibiotics. 8. Any condition that the principal investigator considers warrants exclusion from the trial.