Skip to content

Analysis of two techniques for transcutaneous lower eyelid blepharoplasty: A prospective surgical trial by using random allocation.

In patients with lower eyelid aging are standard lower blepharoplasty and lower blepharoplasty with periorbital fat mobilization and arcus marginalis redrape effective in promoting the rejuvenation of the lower eyelid ?

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12609000732280
Enrollment
50
Registered
2009-08-25
Start date
2005-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to analyze prospectively fifty patients submitted to lower blepharoplasty, using a skin muscle flap, routine canthal support with lateral canthopexy at Federal University of Sao Paulo, between April 2005 and May 2007.

Interventions

Patients submitted to lower eyelid blepharoplasty by two different techniques. The Surgical Group 1 (SG1) consisted of standard fat-resection lower eyelid blepharoplasty. The Surgical Group 2 (SG2) - Subciliary incision was drawn 3 mm below entire lash line, from the punctum medially to the lateral canthal region. The lateral aspect was made 4 to 5mm from lateral canthal angle within an existing crow’s foot. A small incision through skin and muscle was made with a blade at the lateral end of t

Patients submitted to lower eyelid blepharoplasty by two different techniques. The Surgical Group 1 (SG1) consisted of standard fat-resection lower eyelid blepharoplasty. The Surgical Group 2 (SG2) - Subciliary incision was drawn 3 mm below entire lash line, from the punctum medially to the lateral canthal region. The lateral aspect was made 4 to 5mm from lateral canthal angle within an existing crow’s foot. A small incision through skin and muscle was made with a blade at the lateral end of the marking, measuring approximately 10 mm. Straight iris scissors beveling away from the pretarsal orbicularis completed the subciliary skin incision, leaving the pretarsal orbicularis undisturbed. The preseptal orbicularis was opened from mid-pupil to the lateral orbital rim. The scissors were used to develop a plane between the septum and the preseptal orbicularis, then the skin muscle flap was raised, preserving approximately 6 mm of pretarsal orbicularis, exposing the retromuscular space. This flap was dissected to the level of the orbital rim using cutting eletrocautery, thereby the septum orbitale, the capsulopalpebral fascia, the inferior orbital rim, and arcus marginalis were exposed. The junction of the septum orbitale and the periosteum of the inferior orbital rim (arcus marginalis) was released using cutting eletrocautery. After placing a traction stitch to hold the lower lid in extesion, the complex formed by septum orbitale and capsulopalpebral fascia was elevated and the orbital fat from each of the three compartments was released, and conservastively removed or preserved and then repositioned. Only the orbital fat from the medial and central compartments were transposed and sutured to the periosteum with 6-0 Vicryl (registered trademark). The tear trough was corrected by release of the muscular origin contributing to the deformity, addition of volume by fat transposition, and tightening of the skin muscle flap. Next, the junction of the septum orbitale and the periosteum of the inferior orbital rim was reset to its anatomical position (simply suture back to the orbital rim) with interrupted 6-0 Vicryl (registered trademark). Duration of procedure: SG1- 1h 15m SG2- 1h 25m

Sponsors

Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo/Escola Paulista de Medicina (UNIFESP/EPM)
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
30 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Anyone between 30 to 65 years of age electing to undergo blepharoplasty, and who have passed the preoperative evaluation. Preoperative evaluation included a thorough ophthalmologic history including previous ocular or periorbital surgery, history of dry eyes and/or visual disturbance, and any relevant medical conditions.

Exclusion criteria

Patients with history of previous injury or lower eyelid blepharoplasty were excluded from the present study.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026