Skip to content

Traditional portable vacuum dressings versus simple non-mechanized negative pressure dressings in the treatment of lower limb split thickness skin grafting.

A study assessing graft survival in patients requiring split thickness skin grafts by comparing non-mechanised negative pressure dressings to mechanised vacuum dressing

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12609000454279
Acronym
NEWVAC
Enrollment
24
Registered
2009-06-15
Start date
2008-08-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Patients presenting to Gold Coast health service requiring Split thickness skin grafting of the lower limb.

Interventions

non-mechanised [belovac] dressing. Jelonet, dry sterile foam with belovac drain, occlusive dressing are placed on the wound at the time of surgery and remain in situ for 5/6 days post-op. Negative pressure via the belovac drain is apllied for the entire duration. Dressing is then taken down by member of research team, photograph taken and reviewed by blinded team member.

Sponsors

Gold Coast Hospital
Lead SponsorHospital

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

patients requiring split thickness skin grafting of lower limb

Exclusion criteria

Patient not requiring split thickness skin grafting of the lower limb

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026