Skip to content

Burns And Silver In Children: A comparison of the silver based dressings Aquacell and Acticoat for paediatric burns.

A randomised controlled study of the effect of silver based burns dressings Aquacell and Acticoat on percentage epithelialisation in a paediatric emergency department.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12609000451202
Acronym
BASIC
Enrollment
72
Registered
2009-06-12
Start date
2009-10-31
Completion date
2013-10-31
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

This study aims to determine whether Aquacell is a superior silver based dressing compared to Acticoat for paediatric burns managed as an outpatient .

Interventions

Aquacel Ag will be applied to the wound bed with a 3cm overlap to allow for the dressing to shrink. Telfa (an absorbent cotton fabric bonded on both sides with perforated non-adherent film) will be placed over the Aquacel Ag and then Hypafix will be used to hold the dressing in place. These patients will not be instructed to moisten the dressing at home. Patients will be reviewed in 3 days after the initial dressing placement. The Hypafix will be removed, and areas of non-adherence will be tri

Aquacel Ag will be applied to the wound bed with a 3cm overlap to allow for the dressing to shrink. Telfa (an absorbent cotton fabric bonded on both sides with perforated non-adherent film) will be placed over the Aquacel Ag and then Hypafix will be used to hold the dressing in place. These patients will not be instructed to moisten the dressing at home. Patients will be reviewed in 3 days after the initial dressing placement. The Hypafix will be removed, and areas of non-adherence will be trimmed and replaced if still considered to be partial thickness and appropriate for outpatient management. Hypafix will then be re-applied. Patients will be reviewed at day 10 with dressing removal and photography to allow percentage epithelialisation to be assessed

Sponsors

Michael Shepherd
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
0 to 14 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Partial Thickness Burn (blistering and with normal or increased capillary refill) Present to Starship Emergency Department within 24 hours of the burn injury

Exclusion criteria

Superficial epidermal burn (no blistering) Full-thickness burns and Deep Partial-thickness burns Partial-thickness burns > 10% Body surface area Burns to the perineum, genitalia, face, hands or feet (Aquacel Ag contraindicated) Burns over major joints Circumferential Burns Chemical or Electrical burns Allergy to silver Patients referred for evaluation of Non-Accidental-Injury Patients expecting to reside outside Auckland during the 10 day follow-up period.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026