None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
The evidence-based strategies most commonly recommended in treatment guidelines for clinical depression do not distinguish between patients with melancholic depression and those without. This study seeks to demonstrate that a strategy which reflects the different neurobiology of melancholic depression will produce a far better treatment response. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups for 12 weeks of therapy. The first two treatments (an SSRI antidepressant and CBT) are drawn from treatment guidelines, while the third (a Sequencing Drug-based Algorithm [SDA]) has been developed through clinical experience. The principal hypotheses to be tested, which address the comparable effectiveness implied by a sub-typing as against a generic treatment model, are that for individuals with melancholic depression: 1. Those assigned to SDA will show superior remission and responder rates (outcome) to those receiving the SSRI only or CBT only. 2. Those assigned to SSRI only will have a superior outcome to those in CBT only. 3. Differences between treatment arms will not be accounted for by non-specific therapist-based differences.
Interventions
There are three treatment groups in this trial. Current routine management for patients who present with melancholic depression include prescribing citalopram (SSRI) or referral to undergo cognitive behavioural therapy. This study will compare these two management options with a treatment developed through clinical experience, the Sequencing Drug-based Algorithm. Sequencing Drug-based Algorithm (SDA): Those receiving the SDA protocol will initially receive the dual action antidepressant drug venlafaxine (i.e. impacting on serotonergic and noradrenergic functioning), initially daily at 75 mg and progressively titrated up to maximum dose of 300 mg over three weeks – subject to side-effects and response. If no ‘response’ (operationalised as 50% or more improvement in Hamilton score), augmentation by the low dose atypical antipsychotic olanzapine (i.e. 2.5 mg daily) will be initiated in the fourth week, with the latter ceased (at the end of the fifth week) if the subject’s depression remits and the dual action antidepressant maintained. If no ‘response’ or, if a recurrence after ceasing the augmenting drug, the venlafaxine drug will be tapered and ceased over two weeks, and the tricyclic antidepressant drug nortriptyline introduced in the eighth week will be taken daily, and again augmented with an atypical antipsychotic drug if no formal ‘response’ after two weeks for a maximum of two weeks while the tricyclic will be maintained until the end of the twelfth week. [Nortriptyline is chosen as the tricyclic drug, as it has been the most common tricyclic comparator compared to cognitive behaviour therapy]. Each participant will attend eight, 30 minute consultations over the twelve week treatment intervention period.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Age between 18 and 65 years. 2. Current episode of depression, duration between 4 weeks and 2 years. 3. Diagnostic Statistical Manual IV (DSM-IV) diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (with melancholic features) and having a QIDS-SR score of 11 or more (= a score of 14 or more on the Hamilton Depression Scale).
Exclusion criteria
1. More than one failed antidepressant treatment trial. 2. Currently pregnant or breast feeding. 3. Taken antidepressant medication within twelve months. 4. Currently seeing a psychologist. 5. Undergone cognitive behavioural therapy in the last five years. 6. Suicide risk. 7. Comorbid diagnoses of obsessive compulsive disorder, psychosis, bipolar disorder or eating disorder. 8. Current substance abuse or dependence.