Skip to content

Comparing two techniques of skin closure, purse string closure and linear closure, in terms of the incidence of surgical site infection in adults undergoing elective reversal of ileostomy

Randomised control trial of adults undergoing elective reversal of ileostomy, comparison of skin closure techniques, comparing purse string closure with linear closure in terms of the incidence of surgical site infection.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12609000021279
Enrollment
120
Registered
2009-01-12
Start date
2006-11-01
Completion date
2007-12-28
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

This study compares two methods of skin closure following the reversal of ileostomy, purse string and linear closure. The study seeks to determine the incidence of surgical site infection following surgery when these two techniques are used. There is a high incidence of surgical site infection following reversal of ileostomy, and so determining if the use of different skin closure technique can reduce this incidence is important.

Interventions

Skin closure technique for ileostomy reversal, purse string closure. This intervention is used once on each participant in this arm of the study. The intervention involves the technique used for skin closure during the elective operation to reverse the participants ileostomy. This intervention is definitive method of closure of the skin after reversal of the participants ileostomy, it is a permanent procedure. The follow up period for detection of surgical site infection (the primary outcome mea

Skin closure technique for ileostomy reversal, purse string closure. This intervention is used once on each participant in this arm of the study. The intervention involves the technique used for skin closure during the elective operation to reverse the participants ileostomy. This intervention is definitive method of closure of the skin after reversal of the participants ileostomy, it is a permanent procedure. The follow up period for detection of surgical site infection (the primary outcome measure) is 30 days post surgery. Patients will be followed up for as much as a further 2 years to assess the secondary outcome measure, cosmetic result. "Purse string closure" differs from the comparator treatment "linear closure" in terms of the technique use for closure of the skin following the reversal of ileostomy. "Purse string closure" involves a suturing technique that draws the skin together in a circular fashion, in contrast to "linear closure" which abuts the edges of the skin defect, and sutures them closed in a traditional linear fashion.

Sponsors

Stephen Smith
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Adults undergoing elective reversal of ileostomy

Exclusion criteria

Those under 18, those unable to make informed consent to take part in the trial.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Mar 30, 2026