Skip to content

Comparing the use of a "wound protector" with traditional retraction techniques, in terms of the incidence of surgical site infection in adults undergoing elective open colorectal resection surgery.

Randomised control trial of adults undergoing elective open colorectal resection, comparing the use of a "wound protector" with traditional retraction techniques in terms of the incidence of surgical site infection.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12609000020280
Enrollment
320
Registered
2009-01-12
Start date
2007-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

This study compares two methods of retracting the sides of the surgical incision to expose the operation field in open elective colorectal resection surgery, using a "wound protector" versus "traditional retraction techniques". The study seeks to determine the incidence of surgical site infection following surgery when each of these techniques is used. There is a high incidence of surgical site infection following colorectal surgery, and so determining if the use of different retraction techniques can reduce this incidence is important.

Interventions

Method of retraction of sides of surgical incision to expose operation field in open elective colorectal resection, "wound protector". This intervention is used once on each participant in this arm of the study. The intervention involves the use of a "wound protector" for the retraction of the sides of the incision to expose the operation field. The intervention is a temporary measure, it is used only for the duration of the surgical procedure, it is removed immediately before closure of the su

Method of retraction of sides of surgical incision to expose operation field in open elective colorectal resection, "wound protector". This intervention is used once on each participant in this arm of the study. The intervention involves the use of a "wound protector" for the retraction of the sides of the incision to expose the operation field. The intervention is a temporary measure, it is used only for the duration of the surgical procedure, it is removed immediately before closure of the surgical incision. The follow up period for the detection of surgical site infection (the primary outcome measure) is 30 days post surgery. The use of a "wound protector" differs from the comparator technique "traditional retraction techniques" in terms of the technique used to retract the sides of the surgical incision to expose the operation field. The use of a "wound protector" involves the insertion of one end of a plastic cylindrical device into the surgical incision, the device is then wound taut to retract the sides of the incision and expose the operation field. The "wound protector" is removed at the end of the operation, immediately prior to closure of the surgical incision. "Traditional retraction techniques" involves the use of traditional metal surgical retractors to retract the sides of the surgical incision and expose the operation field. These retractors are removed immediately prior the closure of the surgical incision.

Sponsors

Brian Draganic
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Adults undergoing elective open colorectal resection.

Exclusion criteria

Those under 18, those unable to make informed consent to take part in the trial.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026