Skip to content

Protocol to collect the late latency auditory evoked potentials in ten adults with normal hearing

A comparison of the Subtraction of the Ocular´s Artifact and the Control of the Rejection´s Limit protocols, in the record of the late latency auditory evoked potentials in ten adults with normal hearing

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12608000636358
Enrollment
10
Registered
2008-12-16
Start date
2008-05-06
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

To compare two methods to collect the late latency auditory evoked potentials, by the utilization of equipment with two record´s channels and controlling the artifact produced by the ocular's movement.

Interventions

Comparison of two diagnostic´s protocols (subtraction of the ocular´s artifact and control of the rejection´s limit) to collect the late latency auditory evoked potentials. Both protocols are the intervention, which were compared for the selection of the greatest adequate to collect the late latency auditory evoked potentials. Prospective study by the aplication of these two methods in ten normally hearing adults, by the utilization of the equipment with two record´s channels, and controlling th

Comparison of two diagnostic´s protocols (subtraction of the ocular´s artifact and control of the rejection´s limit) to collect the late latency auditory evoked potentials. Both protocols are the intervention, which were compared for the selection of the greatest adequate to collect the late latency auditory evoked potentials. Prospective study by the aplication of these two methods in ten normally hearing adults, by the utilization of the equipment with two record´s channels, and controlling the artifact produced by the ocular´s movement. The subtraction of the ocular´s artifact protocol consist in the subtraction of the ocular´s movement registered in the captivating of the late latency auditory evoked potentials. Unfavourable, the control of the rejection´s limit protocol consist in the no captivating of the ocular´s movement while the record of the late latency auditory evoked potentials. The application of these protocols in the participants remained two months and both protocols were applied only one session in each participant, one followed another, in the same session. The application of each protocol remain about ten minutes.

Sponsors

Luzia Maria Pozzobom Ventura
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomised trial
Intervention model
Crossover
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 31 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Normal hearing and absence of neurologic´s complaints.

Exclusion criteria

Deafness hearing and presence of neurologic´s complaints.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026