Skip to content

PressUre uLCers: Effectiveness of Risk assessment tools. A randomised controlled trial (the ULCER Trial)

Among internal medical patients does screening with pressure ulcer risk assessment tools, compared with no screening, reduce the incidence of pressure ulcers.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12608000541303
Acronym
The ULCER study
Enrollment
1070
Registered
2008-10-27
Start date
2009-04-15
Completion date
2009-12-15
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Pressure ulcer development is a significant risk for hospitalised patients and health care facilities. Pressure ulcer related costs in Australia have been estimated at $285 M per annum. Preventative measures are generally based on estimating the patient’s risk, using screening tools such as the Waterlow scale. Despite the widespread use of the Waterlow scale as an intervention to prevent pressure ulcers, its effectiveness has never been tested using rigorous methods. We propose to conduct a three group, single centred randomised controlled trial to compare the Waterlow Scale, with a simpler, one item measure; and with clinical judgement. We will also investigate risk factors for pressure ulcer development in an acute hospital setting.

Interventions

There are two interventions which will be compared with standard practice. The first is not using any instrument to assess pressure ulcer risk. Patients in this group will not be screened and there will be no pressure ulcer screening instrument in their medical record. The second group will be screened on admission and weekly thereafter until hospital discharge using the Ramstatius tool, which contains only one question related to the patients ability to turn independently. Nurses will receive i

There are two interventions which will be compared with standard practice. The first is not using any instrument to assess pressure ulcer risk. Patients in this group will not be screened and there will be no pressure ulcer screening instrument in their medical record. The second group will be screened on admission and weekly thereafter until hospital discharge using the Ramstatius tool, which contains only one question related to the patients ability to turn independently. Nurses will receive information about the instrument and advised to follow instructions on the form for frequency of re-screening. The study will be conducted over a 12-month period

Sponsors

Joan Webster
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Prevention
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

- Newly admitted to an Internal Medicine ward - Anticipated length of stay of at least 3 days - Not having darkly pigmented skin

Exclusion criteria

Must be free of pressure ulcers on admission

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026