None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
We tested the hypothesis that pre-operative forced-air warming is as effective for anxiolysis as intravenous midazolam, using a blinded, placebo controlled factorial design. One hundred and twenty patients were randomly assigned to cotton blanket and saline injection (n = 30), forced-air warmer and saline injection (n = 30), midazolam 30 lg.kg)1 and cotton blanket (n = 30), and forced-air warmer and midazolam 30 lg.kg)1 (n = 30). Patients completed visual analogue scales for anxiety and thermal comfort, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, at baseline and after 20 min. The estimated effect of midazolam on visual analogue scores for anxiety was )10 (95% CI )3 to )18; p = 0.007) and on state anxiety was )5 (95% CI )7 to )4; p = 0.03). Warming had no influence on visual analogue scores for anxiety (p = 0.50) or state anxiety (p = 0.33), but its estimated effect on thermal comfort was +23 (95% CI 19–27; p < 0.0001). There was no interaction between midazolam and warming. Pre-operative warming was not equivalent to midazolam for anxiolysis and cannot be recommended solely for this purpose.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Patients aged between 18 and 70 years, male and female Presenting for elective surgery Requiring general anaesthesia American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status score 1-3
Exclusion criteria
Cardiothoracic and intracranial surgery Day case surgery Pre-existing anxiety disorder Patients on psychotropic drugs preoperatively Febrile patients T > 37.5 degrees Celsius Allergy to midazolam Obstructive Sleep Apnoea diagnosed on sleep study