Skip to content

DOES EXTERNAL PROFICIENCY TESTING AND METHOD INTERVENTION IMPROVE INTER-SCORER AND INTER-LABORATORY POLYSOMNOGRAM SCORING RELIABILITY?

DOES EXTERNAL PROFICIENCY TESTING AND METHOD INTERVENTION IMPROVE INTER-SCORER AND INTER-LABORATORY POLYSOMNOGRAM SCORING RELIABILITY?

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12607000488404
Enrollment
30
Registered
2007-09-21
Start date
2007-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Polysomnography (PSG) is a clinical test that is used to diagnose breathing disorders that occur during sleep. The most common of this type of disorder is Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA). People with OSA experience periods of partial or complete obstruction of the throat during sleep. It is a serious disorder when severe, with good treatments available. Accurate diagnostic tests are therefore very important. The main outcome measures from the PSG test are the number of obstructions per hour of sleep, the number of arousals from sleep and the amount and quality of sleep. Scoring these features from PSG recordings relies heavily on visual pattern recognition by trained observers applying pre-defined rules. The recognition of features and application of the rules is therefore subject to interpretation by individual scorers and this has the potential to affect measurement reliability. Inter-scorer variations in PSG outcome measures may affect the accuracy of clinical evaluation of individual patients and also decrease statistical power in research studies, particularly multicentre research studies. Several studies have examined the reliability of scoring PSGs. All have demonstrated significant variability in scoring of PSGs and there is therefore a strong incentive to investigate sources of inter-scorer variability and to develop methods aimed at achieving improvements. Our group has recently developed methods that allow measurement of PSG scoring reliability to be assessed and potentially improved through external proficiency testing (EPT). They rely on distributing test PSGs to participating laboratories and determining the consistency of scoring using a purpose-written computer application. However, there are no studies that evaluate whether applying the principles of EPT to PSG scoring is effective in improving scoring consistency. If EPT proves to be ineffective, then it is likely that an active process that aims to align scorer technique will be necessary. The purposes of this study are therefore to: 1. Evaluate whether a program of EPT improves scorer consistency 2. Evaluate whether an active process for identifying and correcting causes of discordance (alignment process) in addition to EPT further improves scorer consistency The demonstration of effective methods for improving scorer consistency will have important benefits for both patient care and research.

Interventions

1. External Proficiency Testing (2 cycles of EPT at 3 and 6 months) 2. External proficiency testing (2 cycles of EPT at 3 and 6 months) plus method alignment (at 1,2,4 and 5 months)

Sponsors

Australasian Sleep Trials Network
Lead SponsorOther Collaborative groups

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Educational / counselling / training
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
-2147483648 N/A to -2147483648 N/A
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Experienced scorers. Availability for duration of study. Study compatable equipment

Exclusion criteria

Nil.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026