Skip to content

The Journey Total Knee Athroplasty 'TKA' project: A comparison of two concepts for improved function of knee replacements.

Patients with osteoarthritis (OA) requiring TKR will have better functional outcomes and satisfaction with the Journey knee when compared to the Genesis II PS knee as measured by degrees of flexion and Oxford Knee Score at 2 years.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12607000365460
Acronym
N/A
Enrollment
240
Registered
2007-07-10
Start date
2006-11-06
Completion date
2010-05-13
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The specific aims are to compare Gen II and Journey TKA regarding : •Patient satisfaction and functional outcome •The degree of postoperative knee flexion. •3D kinematics of the knee joints •Gait pattern •The rate of complications and difficulties •The migration pattern of the tibia trays

Interventions

The intervention is a total knee replacement with either the Journey TKA. Implants will use Oxinium femurs and be fully cemented standard tibia baseplate. The prothesis is permanently implanted.

Sponsors

Perth Orthopaedic Institute
Lead SponsorOther

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Physically active patients, affected by OA of one knee and scheduled for primary TKA. Consent to study.

Exclusion criteria

Inflammatory or post trauma arthritis, Severe osteoporosis, steroid treatment, unclear reason for pain. Previous infection. Non compliance to study, 'Body Mass Index' >35, > 80 years, < 80° flexion, > 15° 'Fixed Flexion Deformity' or varus/ valgus deformity.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026