Skip to content

Randomised controlled trial of the effect of mandibular advancement splint (MAS) versus positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy on blood pressure in obstructive sleep apnoea

Randomised controlled trial of the effect of mandibular advancement splint (MAS) versus positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy on blood pressure in obstructive sleep apnoea

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12607000289415
Acronym
MASPAP
Enrollment
108
Registered
2007-05-31
Start date
2007-06-08
Completion date
2010-12-22
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The broad aim of the project is to compare MAS and CPAP treatment in patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea to test the hypothesis that these treatments have equivalent health effects in terms of important clinical outcomes as a result of the superior efficacy of CPAP being offset by lower treatment compliance than MAS.

Interventions

The study will compare the gold standard treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea, namely Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP), to oral appliance therapy. CPAP treatment involves the delivery of pressurised air from a pump to the nose via tubing and a nose mask. The pressurised air acts to prevent the airway from collapsing during sleep. Oral appliance therapy involves a titratable intra-oral device worn during sleep, that advances the mandible to improve upper airway calibre and function.

The study will compare the gold standard treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea, namely Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP), to oral appliance therapy. CPAP treatment involves the delivery of pressurised air from a pump to the nose via tubing and a nose mask. The pressurised air acts to prevent the airway from collapsing during sleep. Oral appliance therapy involves a titratable intra-oral device worn during sleep, that advances the mandible to improve upper airway calibre and function. The oral appliance being used is a Mandibular Advancement Splint (MAS). Following appropriate acclimatisation to both treatment modalities, patients will undergo 1 month intervention with each treatment (cross-over design) in order to compare the health effects of the treatments. Subjects will be encouraged to use each device every night during sleep. Following treatment on the first device, there will be a 2 week washout period before subjects are crossed over to the second device.

Sponsors

Woolcock Institute of Medical Research
Lead SponsorOther

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Crossover
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Presence of at least 2 symptoms of obstructive sleep apnoea (snoring, fragmented sleep, witnessed apneas, daytime sleepiness); proven obstructive sleep apnoea on polysomnography (AHI>10)

Exclusion criteria

Previous treatment of Obstuctive Sleep Apnoea; central sleep apnea, need for immediate treatment, co-existing sleep disorder, contraindications to oral appliance therapy, regular use of sedatives or narcotics, pre-existing lung disease, active psychiatric disease

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026