Skip to content

Understanding the attentional bias of chronic pain patients

Investigating the effect of attentional training combined with Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT), on the maintenance of Chronic Pain

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12607000148471
Enrollment
64
Registered
2007-02-27
Start date
2007-02-27
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of a new experimental computer task and whether this task will improve the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) for managing chronic pain.

Interventions

Intervention Group: Attentional training using the Dot Probe computer task (4 sessions over 4 weeks, 30 minute task), Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) (8 individual, 1 hr sessions over 8 weeks). All participants will receive CBT and it will involve education about chronic pain, activity pacing, relaxation training, goal setting, problem solving and cognitive restructuring. CBT will have a manual based approach. The dot probe task is a non-invasive computer task. On each trial participants

Intervention Group: Attentional training using the Dot Probe computer task (4 sessions over 4 weeks, 30 minute task), Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) (8 individual, 1 hr sessions over 8 weeks). All participants will receive CBT and it will involve education about chronic pain, activity pacing, relaxation training, goal setting, problem solving and cognitive restructuring. CBT will have a manual based approach. The dot probe task is a non-invasive computer task. On each trial participants will be presented a target word and a neutral word in either the upper or lower half of the computer screen. This is then followed by a visual probe (either a ‘p’ or a ‘q’) presented in the location of one of the previously presented words. The task is to discriminate the probe’s identity as accurately and quickly as possible, by pressing one of two buttons labelled with a ‘p’ and ‘q’. Half of the participants will be randomly allocated to receive the experimental task (ie. attentional re-training which is a biased version of this task, whereby the visual probe always follows the neutral word, in an attempt to retrain participants attention). The other half of the participants will receive a placebo task (ie. an unbiased/randomised version of the task). The control group will receive a placebo computer task and they will also receive CBT. The experimental and placebo computer tasks will be compared to assess whether the experimental task improves the effectiveness of CBT.

Sponsors

Assoc. Prof. Louise Sharpe
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* experience chronic or recurrent pain * able to speak and write in English.

Exclusion criteria

*unable to use both hands*history of a head injury*a serious mental illness or an illicit drug and alcohol problem.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026