Skip to content

A randomised trial of pioglitazone versus metformin monotherapy in Indigenous Australians with Type 2 Diabetes: effects on metabolic and cardiovascular parameters

Drug naïve Indigenous Australians with Type 2 Diabetes, enrolled in a randomised controlled trial of pioglitazone versus metformin monotherapy to assess the effects on metabolic and cardiovascular parameters

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12607000135415
Enrollment
60
Registered
2007-02-19
Start date
2008-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

This study compares metformin (current first-line medication) to rosiglitazone (a newer diabetic medication currently approved for combination use). Whilst there is good evidence for the benefits of rosiglitazone use in other populations, in light of the known weight gain effects of pioglitazone we believe further assessment is required in Indigenous Australians (in whom there is a strong predisposition for central fat deposition). This study will provide evidence regarding the medication appropirate for first line medication in Type 2 diabetes in this high risk population. This study will assist clinicians to make evidenced-based decisions regarding initial medical management of those with Type 2 diabetes (where there is currently a gap in evidence).

Interventions

Pioglitazone 15mg taken orally (Intervention) once a day for 4weeks if tolerated increased to 15mg oral twice a day taken for 6 months by Indigenous Australians with Type 2 Diabetes

Sponsors

Menzies School of Health Research
Lead SponsorCharities/Societies/Foundations

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Residential: Permanent resident of Darwin for at least 1 year immediately before and expected to be for at least 1 year after study commencesConsent: Participants must be able to give informed voluntary consent.

Exclusion criteria

Women not on a reliable means of contraceptionIndividuals who are unable to give voluntary informed consentIndividual’s permanently living outside of Darwin during the study period.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026