Skip to content

Randomised comparison of the Ambu® Laryngeal Mask with the Laryngeal Mask Airway UniqueTM during anaesthesia in spontaneously breathing adult patients

A single-blind randomised phase IV study to evaluate the effectiveness of the AMBU Aura-once disposable Laryngeal Mask against the Laryngeal Mask Airway -unique wih respect to sealing pressure and ease of use for airway maintenance during spontaneous ventilation general anaesthesia

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12606000429550
Enrollment
100
Registered
2006-10-04
Start date
2006-09-28
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Randomised trial of two supraglottic airway devices by measuring objective outcomes in spontaneously breathing adult patients. Our hypothesis is that there will be no identifiable difference (null hypothesis).

Interventions

AMBU laryngeal mask over the course of a single general anaesthetic procedure and 24 hrs post-operatively Laryngeal Mask Airway - Unique over the course of a single general anaesthetic procedure and 24 hrs post-operatively

Sponsors

Royal Melbourne Hospital - Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management
Lead SponsorHospital

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Adults who are undergoing general anaesthesia suitable for a LMA.

Exclusion criteria

Recognised non suitability for supraglottic airway usage.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026