Skip to content

The effect of simplified stool sampling on participation in colon cancer screening

Rate of participation in faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening: The impact of one-stool versus two-stool sampling

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12606000227594
Enrollment
1200
Registered
2006-06-05
Start date
2006-06-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

There has been limited uptake of population screening for colorectal cancer in Australia and other western countries, using faecal occult blood testing. We have previously determined that the InSure faecal immunochemical test (FIT) used in single sample format has similar sensitivity for significant colorectal neoplasia (cancer and significant adenomas) relative to the standard two stool sample test. Our hypothesis is that single stool sampling will result in improved population participation in screening compared to the standard InSure test. This study will compare population participation in screening in two groups, one offered the screening test in single stool sample format, compared to the control (standard InSure test, 2 stool sample format).

Interventions

Participation at 12 weeks from offer of screening for colorectal cancer in the intervention group using a screening test requiring only a single stool sample to be collected for testing for occult blood.

Sponsors

Prof Graeme Young, Dept of Medicine, Flinders University of South Australia
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
50 Years to 74 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Residing in specific postcodes in southern Adelaide.

Exclusion criteria

Specified pre-existing clinical conditions that makes FOBT-screening uninformative or that preclude follow-up colonoscopy, people already participating in other Bowel Health Service research studies.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026