None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
For patients with malignant bowel obstruction that cannot be cured, palliative surgery is often required to relieve the obstruction. This usually requires the formation of a stoma or opening where the bowel is brought to the suface of the skin. An alternative to surgery is the placement of a metal tube or stent through the obstruction to allow the passage of stool. As these surgical interventions are palliative the most important outcomes are those relating to the patients quality of life. This study will determine whether patients' quality of life is greater following stent insertion than surgery to relieve bowel obstruction. It will also compare complication rates and resource utilisation for each intervention. An economic evaluation will determine the relative cost-effectiveness of the 2 procedures.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
All adult patients who present with malignant large bowel obstruction proven radiologically & deemed non-curable by surgical interention.
Exclusion criteria
If a patient is unfit for surgical iintervention (ASA grade iv & v), require urgent laparotomy due to perferation or ischaemia of the bowel, have evidence of synchronous & seperate sites of the small & large bowel, or are cognitively impaired or otherwise unable to give informed consent.