Skip to content

Evaluation of the accuracy of pulse oximeters compared with CO-Oximetry in hypoxaemic normal subjects.

Evaluation of the accuracy of pulse oximeters compared with CO-Oximetry in hypoxaemic normal subjects.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12606000131550
Acronym
Nil
Enrollment
12
Registered
2006-04-11
Start date
2005-11-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Pulse oximeters are used in many areas of clinical medicine and a clear understanding of their performance is critical to appropriate and safe use. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of a new pulse oximeter under a range of oxygen conditions compared with CO-ocimetry, which is the current reference method for this measurement.

Interventions

Subjects are acutely exposed to a range of hypoxic gas mixtures to induce falls in arterial oxygen saturation in the range 95-70%. Oximeter readings (SpO2) are compared with simultaneously determined CO-oximetry measurements of SaO2 from arterial blood samples. These samples are drawn once a steady state has been achieved at each level of hypoxaemia, usually 3-5 minutes.

Sponsors

Institute for Breathing and Sleep
Lead SponsorOther

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Adults

Exclusion criteria

Cardiac or respiratory disease. History of CVA.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026