Skip to content

Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic resection rectopexy compared with fixation rectopexy for rectal prolapse

Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic resection rectopexy compared with fixation rectopexy for rectal prolapse

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12605000748617
Enrollment
132
Registered
2005-11-16
Start date
2006-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Rectal prolapse is a common and socially debilitating condition for which treatment is surgical. This trial will compare two procedures, namely laparoscopic resection rectopexy and laparoscopic fixation rectopexy, in order to determine which has the better short and long term outcomes.

Interventions

Sponsors

Surgical Outcomes Research Centre - based in Royal Prince Alfred Hospital.
Lead SponsorHospital

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Single group
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

All adult patients attending participating surgeons for management of full thickness rectal prolapse and who are candidates for abdominal surgery will be eligible to participate.

Exclusion criteria

Patients who are cognitively impaired or otherwise unable to give informed consent, those who require concomitant abdominal surgery and those considered unsuitable for laparoscopic surgery will be excluded. In addition, patients who are considered ineligible for fixation rectopexy on the basis of severe pre-operative constipation will be excluded at the discretion of their surgeon.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026