The effectiveness of vaginal prolapse repair employing mesh augmentation.

A comparison of the effectiveness of traditional vaginal colporraphy with colporraphay using mesh augmentation in women with vaginal prolapse as assessed using the pelvic organ prolpse quantification examination.

Status

Completed

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

ANZCTR

Registry ID

ACTRN12605000621617

Enrollment

128

Registered

2005-10-10

Start date

2003-02-17

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention group- Vaginal colporaphy with the use of mesh.

Study design

Allocation

Randomised controlled trial

Intervention model

Parallel

Primary purpose

Treatment

Masking

Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

0 to No maximum

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

Women with posterior and anterior vaginal wall prolapse with at least one site being of stage 2 or more.(ICS quantitative pelvic organ prolapse examination system).Women with cocomitant urinary symptoms and /or anorectal symptoms maybe included.Women requiring anterior and posterior repair.Women with urodynamic stress incontinence will be offered a mid urethral sling procedure.Willingness to participate.

Exclusion criteria

Women with apical or vault prolapse of stage 2 or more(ICS quantitative pelvic organ porlapse examination system).Medically unfit for surgery.Women undergoing concomittant abdominal surgery for prolapse eg abdominal sacral colpopexy, Paravaginal repair.Refusal to participate.

Outcome results