Skip to content

Can routine N-of-1 studies improve net benefits and reduce costs by better targeting chronic therapy?

Can routine N-of-1 studies improve net benefits and reduce costs by better targeting chronic therapy for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder?

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12605000507684
Enrollment
108
Registered
2005-09-26
Start date
2000-08-07
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

This single patient (n of 1) trial is a randomised, double-blind, cross-over comparison of methylphenidate and placebo within an individual patient. The patient will undergo three pairs of treatment periods. The order of treatment in each cycle will be determined by random allocation. The choice of initial therapy will be balanced in blocks of four, to ensure that equivalent numbers start the IMET on each of the two medications. Patients, parents and practitioners will all be blinded to whic

This single patient (n of 1) trial is a randomised, double-blind, cross-over comparison of methylphenidate and placebo within an individual patient. The patient will undergo three pairs of treatment periods. The order of treatment in each cycle will be determined by random allocation. The choice of initial therapy will be balanced in blocks of four, to ensure that equivalent numbers start the IMET on each of the two medications. Patients, parents and practitioners will all be blinded to which treatment the patients are taking. Product information will be provided to the patient and parent at the beginning of the study. Parents, teachers, and patients over 12 years will complete ADHD Rating Scales at the end of two days (or one week for the 6 week IMET). If at any time during the study the patient feels worse, that treatment period can be terminated, and they can go on to the next treatment period. Upon completion of the study, the timing of the active treatment will be revealed. After looking at the symptoms recorded, the doctor and patient decide together whether methylphenidate is of significant benefit. If the patient chooses, they can then continue on that medication, confident that it is effective for them.

Sponsors

University of Queensland
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomised trial
Intervention model
Crossover
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
0 to 19 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Any school age patient with a clinical diagnosis of ADHD of at least a month's duration, made by a medical practitioner, and who is stabilised on treatment with the stimulant. Patient, parent and doctor would like to use the Individualised Medication Effectiveness Test methodology to see if the patient is a responder to the stimulant.

Exclusion criteria

Symptomatic cardiovascular disease. Moderate to severe hypertension. Hyperthyroidism. Phaeochromocytoma. Glaucoma. Agitated states. Anxiety. Motor tics. Tourette syndrome. MAOIs (+/- 14 days). Idiosyncratic reaction to sympathomimetic amines. History of drug abuse.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026