Skip to content

Individual Medication Effectiveness Tests (IMETs) to assess the efficacy of gabapentin in individual patients with chronic neuropathic pain.

Individual Medication Effectiveness Tests (IMETs) to assess the efficacy of gabapentin in individual patients with chronic neuropathic pain.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12605000479606
Enrollment
150
Registered
2005-09-23
Start date
2006-04-02
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

This single patient (n of 1) IMET is a randomised, double-blind, cross-over comparison of gabapentin and placebo within an individual patient. We will do an initial open label trial to see if gabapentin is effective, and for dose finding. Once the dose has been decided (see medication section), we will use two week treatment periods, with measurement in the second week, allowing for wash out. There will be 3 pairs of 2 week treatment periods, making a total of twelve weeks. The order of drugs

This single patient (n of 1) IMET is a randomised, double-blind, cross-over comparison of gabapentin and placebo within an individual patient. We will do an initial open label trial to see if gabapentin is effective, and for dose finding. Once the dose has been decided (see medication section), we will use two week treatment periods, with measurement in the second week, allowing for wash out. There will be 3 pairs of 2 week treatment periods, making a total of twelve weeks. The order of drugs in each cycle will be determined by random allocation. The choice of initial therapy will be balanced in blocks of four, to ensure that equivalent numbers start the IMET on each of the two drugs. Patients and practitioners will all be blinded to which treatment the patients are taking. Product information about gabapentin will be provided to the patient at the beginning of the study. The patient will keep careful track of their symptoms by recording them in a special diary. If at any time during the study the patient feels worse, that treatment period can be terminated, and they can go on to the next treatment period. Upon the completion of the study, the timing of the active treatment will be revealed. After looking at the symptoms recorded, the doctor and patient decide together whether gabapentin was of greater benefit than placebo. If the patient chooses, they can then continue on the drug, confident that it is effective.

Sponsors

University of Queensland
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomised trial
Intervention model
Crossover
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Any adult patient with a clinical diagnosis of chronic neuropathic pain, defined as pain due to damage or dysfunction involving the peripheral or central nervous systems, and including phantom limb pain, poststroke pain, causalgia, postherpetic neuralgia, diabetic neuropathy, trigeminal neuralgia, and complex regional pain syndrome. Pain needs to be of at least 3 months' duration, of sufficient severity to warrant consideration of long-term gabapentin use, in the opinion of the attending medical practitioner. Many such patients may already be on gabapentin.

Exclusion criteria

Previous sensitivity to gabapentin, patients with a history of seizure, pregnancy, renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 30 mls/min), certain H2 antagonists.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026