Skip to content

The influence of initial screening test technology on participation in rescreening for colorectal cancer

The influence of initial screening test technology on participation in rescreening for colorectal cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12605000462684
Enrollment
1818
Registered
2005-09-22
Start date
2001-04-02
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Colorectal cancer population screening programs commonly suffer from poor participation. Therefore it is important to reduce as many barriers as possible. Some screening tests affect participation, this is associated with level of technology. As screening most effective when conducted regularly, it is important to determine the impact of the initial screening experience on participation in further rounds. This study determined the impact of the level of technology of the test used in the first round of offers on participation in a second round where all people were offered the test that elicited the highest participation in the first round (ie the 'preferred' test. In the first round there were 3 groups each offered sceening using a different test. Intervention group 1 used Hemoccult II Sensa, a low technology guaiac based test requiring restricted diet for 6 days, sampling stool by spatula and 6 applications of stool to collection device, Intervention group 2 used FlexSure OBT, a mid level technology immunochemical test without restricted diet, sampling stool by spatula, 3 applications of stool to collection device, Intervention group 3 used InSure OBT, high level technology- immunochemical test, without diet, sampling stool by brush, 2 applications of stool sample. Intervention group 3 (InSure) returned the highest participation and was thus considered the preferred test. All people received Insure in the second round of offers.

Interventions

The aim is to determine the effect of the type of test offered in a first round of a screening program for colorectal cancer on participation in a second round. Group 1: First round of screening Hemoccult II Sensa, low technology test. Second round of screening: InSure test, high technology. Group 2: First round of screening: FlexSure OBT, mid technology test. Second round: InSure OBT, high technology. Group 3: First round of screening: InSure OBT, high technology test. Second round: InSure OBT,

The aim is to determine the effect of the type of test offered in a first round of a screening program for colorectal cancer on participation in a second round. Group 1: First round of screening Hemoccult II Sensa, low technology test. Second round of screening: InSure test, high technology. Group 2: First round of screening: FlexSure OBT, mid technology test. Second round: InSure OBT, high technology. Group 3: First round of screening: InSure OBT, high technology test. Second round: InSure OBT, high technology.

Sponsors

Prof. Graeme Young MD, FRACP
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Prevention
Masking
Blinded (masking used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
50 Years to 69 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

First round of screeningInclusion: Present on the electoral roll of the South Australian Electoral Commission on 01/02/2001.

Exclusion criteria

None but invitees provided with a list of conditions and settings where faecal occult blood based screening is inappropriate and requesting self-exclusion by not participating.Second round of screening.Inclusion: Selected for the first round of screening invitationsExclusion: People identified during Round 1 as having gastrointestinal conditions that invalidate screening results, people identified with mental and physical disabilities that prevent them from following the study protocol, people known to have had a neoplasia negative colonoscopy 5 years prior to a screening offer, people whose first round kits were returned unopened and 'not known at this address', people who informed the screening facility that they did not want further contact.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026