Uterosacral ligament suspension

PROCEDURE2 trials

Sponsors

NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences

Conditions

Pelvic Organ ProlapseUterovaginal Prolapse

Unknown Phase

Study of Uterine Prolapse Procedures - Randomized Trial

CompletedNCT01802281

NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders NetworkUterovaginal Prolapse

Start: 2013-04-01End: 2025-03-07Updated: 2025-08-26

Comparison of Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation and Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Apical Prolapse Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

B.P. Koirala Institute of Health SciencesPelvic Organ Prolapse

Start: 2023-01-31End: 2025-07-31Target: 194Updated: 2023-01-04

Related Papers

Sacrospinous Hysteropexy With Mesh vs Vaginal Hysterectomy for Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse: 10-Year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

2026-06-24

MRI 2-D Parameters Associated with Native Tissue or Transvaginal Mesh Surgical Apical Prolapse Repair Failure

International Urogynecology Journal2026-05-30

Association Between Enlarged Genital Hiatus and Composite Surgical Failure After Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension

Urogynecology2022-12-236 citations

Reoperation for prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous mesh hysteropexy: characteristics of women choosing retreatment.

2022-11-302 citations

Characteristics associated with composite surgical failure over 5 years of women in a randomized trial of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.

2022-08-023 citations

Sexual Activity and Dyspareunia 1 Year After Surgical Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Obstetrics and Gynecology2020-08-0524 citations

Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse

JAMA2019-09-1791 citations