Traditional corticotomy

PROCEDURE5 trials

Sponsors

Damascus University

Conditions

Class II Div 1 MalocclusionClass II Division 1 MalocclusionMalocclusion, Angle Class II, Division 1Protrusion, Incisor

Unknown Phase

Effectiveness of Two Corticotomy Techniques in Retracting the Upper Anterior Teeth by Using Miniscrews

CompletedNCT03279042

Damascus UniversityClass II Div 1 Malocclusion, Protrusion, Incisor

Start: 2016-09-12End: 2018-05-15Updated: 2018-08-24

Comparison Between Two Methods in the Acceleration of the Retraction of Upper Canines

CompletedNCT03659188

Damascus UniversityMalocclusion, Angle Class II, Division 1

Start: 2018-09-02End: 2020-08-12Updated: 2023-03-31

Evaluation of Upper Anterior Teeth Retraction Rate Assisted by Two Corticotomy Techniques

CompletedNCT04847492

Damascus UniversityClass II Division 1 Malocclusion

Start: 2017-06-09End: 2018-10-15Updated: 2021-04-21

Evaluation of the Levels of Pain and Discomfort Associated With Two Techniques of Corticotomy

CompletedNCT05040945

Damascus UniversityClass II Division 1 Malocclusion

Start: 2018-02-15End: 2019-05-15Updated: 2021-09-10

Patient Outcomes Associated With Two Accelerated Method of Retraction of Upper Front Teeth

CompletedNCT05928143

Damascus UniversityClass II Division 1 Malocclusion

Start: 2018-02-15End: 2020-05-15Updated: 2023-07-03

Related Papers

Is It Possible to Achieve Favorable Accelerated Dental Changes with No Periodontal Complications When Retracting Upper Anterior Teeth Assisted by Flapless Corticotomy Compared to Traditional Corticotomy? A Two-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial

The Scientific World JOURNAL2022-03-0721 citations

The effectiveness of traditional corticotomy vs flapless corticotomy in miniscrew-supported en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion: A single-centered, randomized controlled clinical trial.

2020-11-0442 citations