Fluid Sparing Resuscitation Strategy

OTHER2 trials

Sponsors

McMaster Children's Hospital, McMaster University

Conditions

Septic Shock

Phase 3

Pilot Study for the SQUEEZE Trial

CompletedNCT01973907

McMaster Children's HospitalSeptic Shock

Start: 2014-01-31End: 2016-06-30Updated: 2016-08-18

Unknown Phase

SQUEEZE Trial: A Trial to Determine Whether Septic Shock Reversal is Quicker in Pediatric Patients Randomized to an Early Goal Directed Fluid Sparing Strategy vs. Usual Care

CompletedNCT03080038

McMaster UniversitySeptic Shock

Start: 2017-03-06End: 2021-12-31Updated: 2022-05-09

Related Papers

The SQUEEZE pilot trial: a trial to determine whether septic shock reversal is quicker in pediatric patients randomized to an early goal directed fluid-sparing strategy vs. usual care.

2025-11-28

Statistical analysis plan for the SQUEEZE trial: A trial to determine whether septic shock reversal is quicker in pediatric patients randomized to an early goal-directed fluid-sparing strategy vs. usual care (SQUEEZE)

Critical Care and Resuscitation2024-06-013 citations

A trial to determine whether septic shock-reversal is quicker in pediatric patients randomized to an early goal-directed fluid-sparing strategy versus usual care (SQUEEZE): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.

2016-11-2233 citations

Abstract 12442: Exception to Consent in Pediatric Resuscitation Research: Exploring the Experiences of Substitute Decision Makers

Circulation2016-11-11

Exploring the experiences of substitute decision-makers with an exception to consent in a paediatric resuscitation randomised controlled trial: study protocol for a qualitative research study.

2016-09-133 citations