conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy

PROCEDURE4 trials

Sponsors

The Cleveland Clinic, Kantonsspital Aarau, Samsung Medical Center

Conditions

Duration of SurgeryIntraoperative ComplicationsLaparoscopic Technique no Switch to OpenPostoperative ComplicationsUterine AdenomyosisUterine Fibroids, Menorrhagia, EndometriosisUterine Myoma

Phase 3

Study of Different Pain Scores in Single-Port Access (SPA) Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

CompletedNCT01064128

Samsung Medical CenterUterine Adenomyosis, Uterine Myoma

Start: 2010-01-31End: 2010-12-31Target: 40Updated: 2011-07-20

Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Samsung Medical CenterUterine Adenomyosis, Uterine Myoma

Start: 2011-12-31End: 2013-03-31Target: 240Updated: 2012-02-22

Unknown Phase

Study Comparing Conventional vs. Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

CompletedNCT00485355

The Cleveland ClinicUterine Fibroids, Menorrhagia, Endometriosis

Start: 2007-06-30End: 2012-12-31Updated: 2014-02-19

Clinical Trial Comparing Conventional and Robot-assisted(Da Vinci®)Laparoscopic Interventions for Hysterectomy

CompletedNCT00683293

Kantonsspital AarauDuration of Surgery, Intraoperative Complications, Laparoscopic Technique no Switch to Open +1

Start: 2008-11-30End: 2011-12-31Updated: 2014-04-16