Cephalic vein access

DEVICE2 trials

Sponsors

Castilla-La Mancha Health Service, Hospices Civils de Lyon

Conditions

ComplicationDefibrillatorsImplantable Cardioverter-defibrillatorPacemakerPacemaker Electrode Lead FracturePacemakers

Unknown Phase

Efficacy and Safety in Pacemaker and Defibrillator Implantation Via Cephalic Versus Axillary Vein Access (CEPHAX)

Castilla-La Mancha Health ServiceComplication, Defibrillators, Pacemaker Electrode Lead Fracture +1

Start: 2017-10-01End: 2022-10-31Updated: 2019-03-01

Ultrasound-guided Axillary Vein Access Versus Cephalic Venous Cutdown for Implantation of Cardiac Electronic Devices.

CompletedNCT04649788

Hospices Civils de LyonImplantable Cardioverter-defibrillator, Pacemaker

Start: 2020-07-17End: 2022-11-25Updated: 2025-08-26

Related Papers

Fluoroscopy‐guided axillary vein access vs cephalic vein access in pacemaker and defibrillator implantation: Randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety

Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology2019-07-1643 citations